Cartridge Clash – .270 Win Vs 6.5 Greedmoor


The .270 Win. has accomplished worldwide acknowledgment by athlete because of its gentle disposition and deadly potential. With projectiles from 100 to 150 grains, it consolidates level direction with moderate force. Speeds can finish off 3,000 fps with a 140-grain shot without stretching boundaries, and since the cartridge appeared during the 1920s, it has generally stayed a somewhat well known bullet.


In 2007, Hornady’s Dave Emary and champion shooter Dennis Demille planned a 6.5 contest cartridge in view of the .30 T/C. In contrast to its parent cartridge, the 6.5 Creedmoor won fans in a rush. While it was a contest cartridge by plan – mating long, high-BC wind-kicking projectiles with a short, effective case and low backlash – the 6.5 Creedmoor 45 long colt ammo for sale turned into a hybrid round.


There’s a lot of cross-over between the .270 and 6.5 in the field. The Creedmoor utilizes slugs from 95 to 160 grains, the .270 with projectiles from 100 to 150 grains, so there are more choices with the 6.5.


In any case, the .270 Win. enjoys a benefit concerning sheer speed and energy. With a 140-grain slug, the 6.5 Creedmoor battles to arrive at 2,725 fps, though the .270 Win. can undoubtedly top 2,900 fps and might break 3,000. However, the additional speed and energy requires more powder, a more drawn out activity, and the outcome is a heavier firearm that creates more backlash.


However, gag speed is just a single part of a cartridge that can perform at longer ranges. You should likewise think about a slug’s ballistic coefficient, and the 6.5 Creedmoor has the high ground there. The 129-grain Hornady InterBond 6.5 shot has a BC of .485 contrasted with the 130-grain .270 Inter-Bond’s .460; the 140-grain 6.5 SST’s.520 BC eclipses the 140-grain .270.


SST’s figure of .495. That likens to less wind float, and the long, weighty 6.5

shot’s high sectional thickness implies a Greedmoor projectile implied for hunting will enter profound to drop major game. The Creedmoor is likewise a magnificently productive cartridge plan. With 140-grain projectiles the 6.5 Creedmoor accomplishes 2,700 fps with 42.3 grains of Hybrid 100V powder or 42.8 grains of Winchester 760.


To accomplish that equivalent speed with a .270, you’ll require 49.2 and 50.3 grains of powder, individually. It’s more affordable, in this way, to reload the Creedmoor, concerning powder utilization. Also, albeit the .270 Win. is barely to be viewed as a weighty pulling back round, it creates around 15% more force than the bashful 6.5 Creedmoor, as well as more gag impact.


Practically every centerfire ammo maker offers no less than one burden for the .270 Win.; the equivalent can’t be said for the 6.5 Creedmoor-essentially not yet. In like manner, practically every manual rifle made offers a .270 variation, in spite of the fact that producers like Savage and Browning are adding rifles loaded in 6.5 Creedmoor consistently.


Assuming that the cartidge’s direction proceeds, it very well may be as broadly accessible in the future as the.270, however for the second the Winchester cartridge stays the more pervasive decision. As far as use on deer-size game, both of these cartridges will function admirably to longer ranges.


On bigger game like elk, the .270 Win. enjoys the benefit. Assuming you accept the maxim that it takes 2,000 ft.- lbs. of energy to kill a bull, then, at that point, the .270 conveys that degree of energy with most loads to approximately 300 yards though the run of the mill 6.5 Creedmoor load falls beneath that number somewhere in the range of 100 and 200 yards.


On the off chance that you don’t handload, the .270 is most likely a superior choice basically on the grounds that rifles and ammunition are all over. If you handload, you can exploit the wide assortment of 6.5 projectiles. Main concern is that these two cartridges will work well for you, and hanging the expression “failure” on possibly one is unthinkable.”


.270 WIN.




Better execution at moderate reaches

Extended history on game

Enormous ammunition, rifle choice



Requires longer activity, heavier rifle

Produces more force than the 6.5

Not as extraordinary part projectile choice





Short-activity rifles and low backlash

Great BC and SD figures

Progressively more weapon, ammunition decisions



Not as viable on elk-size game

Ammunition still not generally accessible

Future not cut in stone

Strategic Survivalist


Picking the right cartridge for your rifle can be testing – here we contrast two hot bullets with see which round is awesome!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.